29 September 2010

Open Cuba

The following was my response to the USA Today editorial regarding Cuba, dtd 27 Sep 2010.



Addressing the issue of relations with Cuba seems to always draw a maelstrom of emotions from individuals and groups who continually bully it off the agenda for any intellectual discussions. 

So why do we view the island nation as a threat to our way of life?  We must get beyond archaic Cold War attitudes and move forward with foreign policy enlightenment reflective of current and future global strategies.  After all, Communism as a governance system has proven to be ineffective and a politically endangered species. 

How different is the situation regarding China?  The Asian giant is plagued with allegations of human rights violations, and addresses the sovereignty of Taiwan with a contentious if not bullying approach.  And yet the United States goods imports from China were close to $300 billion last year.

Where is our credibility as a global leader if we can’t even take care of business in our own backyard?  Now is the time to stop treating Cuba like the 600-pound gorilla in the room and reestablish diplomatic and economic relations with our southern neighbor.

Finally, remember the Maine?  The USS Maine blew up in Havana Harbor 15 Feb 1898 with the loss of 260 American lives.  US Navy investigators found inconclusive evidence as to the cause of the explosion.  Similar as today, it was an outspoken populace fueled by external influences that shaped opinion and eventually drove the US political response.


01 September 2010

Time to Turn the Page


Last night the US President announced the end of combat mission in Iraqi.  While I applaud his actions, especially with the announcement occurring on my final day in the US Army, it concerns me whether or not it’s being done for the right reasons.

Why the war in Iraq was initiated in the first place is one for historians and politicians to argue and debate in the years to come.  Personally, I am beyond that – too many hours were spent on this particular at the USAWC – now my focus is our extended family that continues the mission in my absence.

The President noted a couple of issues that immediately caught my attention: the “violence will not end” and the remaining US military will redirect their efforts to an “advising and assisting role.”  That being said, of concern is the issue of rules of engagement for the troops in Iraq.  Will they no longer have the ability to adequately protect and defend themselves while in theater?

The President also noted, “We must use all elements of our power.”  That should be a given in times of any crisis – foreign or domestic.  As for “Diplomats, aid workers, and advisors – are moving into the lead,” the question becomes, Where ya been??  Because the State Department was too slow on the upswing of resolving the issues of nation rebuilding as well as a number of the NGOs, the military in many cases had to step up to the traditional civilian roles to put in place civil infrastructure or see to their creation.

In the Q&A session the White House communications office had on uTube following the President’s speech there were a couple of reoccurring questions that probably was on everyone’s mind.  Will the money we have been putting into the war now be used on other things to jump-start the economy? And, How much will ending the Iraq war save in defense spending?

In this time of recession and depression fears these are realistic questions each of us should be asking our elected representatives – especially with elections less than two and a half months away.  But before anyone runs off to play stump the chump with the candidates there’s a couple of tidbits of information to also keep in mind.  One, this war has been for the most part done on the cheap – in terms of money.  In previous wars the nation postured themselves into a wartime footing taking significant amount of funding and materials into the fight. 

While there was significantly more funding available to prepare our military for war from what was allotted prior to 9-11, it was still not at the levels experienced in previous wars.  Of note, the latest weapon, the M-4 rifle, is still not fully fielded throughout the Army; consequently, Soldiers aren’t normally issued the weapon until they are preparing for deployment.  Helicopters lost in the war are not readily replaced, but shifted around from other aviation units not in the deployment window.  Most up-armored vehicles are kept in theater for rotation after rotation after rotation – sooner or later someone is going to have to absorb the cost of their replacement.  And the list goes on.

There are also the post-deployment medical costs that have only just begun.  We the people cannot afford or allow the affects of PTSD, suicide, physical trauma, and other disorders to simply slip to the back pages of everyday life.  These kids stepped forward when our nation called and rode to the sound of the guns to help preserve our way of life.  So, lets not make their care an issue of political contention.

The bottom line, it’s reasonable to assume this war will continue to cost us long after the last Soldier turns out the lights and flies back to the world.

What the President and I do agree on – yes, it’s time to turn the page.